Legal Opinion

Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 1, 1932PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a motion for permission to the appellee to apply to the District Court for leave to amend its answer alleging, and to take testimony establishing, inequitable conduct by the appellant in publishing and disseminating false and misleading statements regarding the decision of this court upon the theory *80that such, conduct should bar all relief to the appellant herein.

This court modified the interlocutory decree of the District Court, 52 F.(2d) 951, and held that the “Evans. Automatic” cigar lighter infringed the appellant’s claims 7,12,13, and 14, and that the “Evans Roller Bearing”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Adriance, Platt & Co. v. National Harrow Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  2. A. B. Farquhar Co. v. National Harrow Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1900
  3. Alliance Securities Co. v. De Vilbiss Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  4. Racine Paper Goods Co. v. DittgenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1909
  5. Gairing Tool Co. v. Eclipse Interchangeable Counterbore Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  2. American Ball Co. v. Federal Cartridge CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. Ronson Patents Corp. v. Sparklets DevicesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1953
  4. United Kingdom Optical Co. v. American Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934
  5. Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API