Naveed Gulzar v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
Naveed Gulzar pled guilty to theft in 2006. In 2011, he sought post-conviction relief on the grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. Specifically, Gulzar argued that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him that automatic deportation was a consequence of his pleading guilty to theft. The post-conviction court denied relief. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
Gulzar was born in Pakistan and entered the United States in 2000, when he was approximately fourteen years old. Gulzar immigrated to the United States with his mother, father,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- French v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Segura v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Angelo Bobadilla v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
- Major Wilson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Alex Carrillo v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Bobadilla v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Jonathan Stephens v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.