Lee v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BOEHM, Justice.
Multiple convictions do not violate Indiana’s Double Jeopardy Clause if they logically could have been based on the same facts, but in light of the evidence, the instructions, the charges, and the argument of counsel, there is no reasonable possibility that the jury actually used exactly the same set of facts to establish both convictions.
Facts and Procedural History
Roderick Lee was convicted of burglary and attempted armed robbery and sentenced to consecutive twenty-year terms on each count. On direct appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed Lee’s convictions and sentences. Lee…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Spivey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Henley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- State v. WatkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Juan M. Garrett v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
- Cornelius Hines v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
- Chappell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Helton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.