Martin v. Township of Millcreek
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bt
Judge Craig,
The issue in this case is the validity of a ten acre minimum one-family lot size established by the Mill-creek Township Zoning Ordinance provisions applicable to an E-l “Ecogically Sensitive District”, covering one-third of the area of that semi-rural township, which elsewhere requires a one-acre 111111111111111 lot area per family.
This zoning appeal is from a decision of the Common Pleas Court of Lebanon County which upheld the refusal of the Millcreek Township Board of Supervisors (township) to adopt a curative amendment by which landowner Ivan W. Martin (owner) had…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Girsh AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Concord Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Surrick v. ZHB OF U. PROVIDENCE TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- C & M Developers, Inc. v. Bedminster Township Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Kirk v. ZONING BD. OF HONEY BROOK TOWNSHIPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Stahl v. Upper Southampton Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- McGonigle v. Lower Heidelberg Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Hock v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.