Legal Opinion

Martin v. Township of Millcreek

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1980No. Appeal, 413 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

Judge Craig,

The issue in this case is the validity of a ten acre minimum one-family lot size established by the Mill-creek Township Zoning Ordinance provisions applicable to an E-l “Ecogically Sensitive District”, covering one-third of the area of that semi-rural township, which elsewhere requires a one-acre 111111111111111 lot area per family.

This zoning appeal is from a decision of the Common Pleas Court of Lebanon County which upheld the refusal of the Millcreek Township Board of Supervisors (township) to adopt a curative amendment by which landowner Ivan W. Martin (owner) had…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Girsh AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Concord Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Surrick v. ZHB OF U. PROVIDENCE TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. C & M Developers, Inc. v. Bedminster Township Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Kirk v. ZONING BD. OF HONEY BROOK TOWNSHIPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Stahl v. Upper Southampton Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. McGonigle v. Lower Heidelberg Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Hock v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API