Legal Opinion

Hock v. Board of Supervisors

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 1993No. 627 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG, President Judge.

Landowner Gary M. Hock appeals a decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Columbia County affirming a decision of the Board of Supervisors of Mount Pleasant Township that (1) denied the landowner’s request for a curative amendment and (2) upheld the validity of a three-acre minimum lot size requirement for the development of single-family dwellings in Open Space Districts in the township.

The issues in this case are: (1) whether the township’s ordinance is constitutionally invalid because it is unduly restrictive and confiscatory by requiring a minimum lot size of three…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Concord Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Overstreet v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Martin v. Township of MillcreekCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Hess v. Upper Oxford TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kirk v. ZONING BD. OF HONEY BROOK TOWNSHIPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Crystal Forest Associates, LP v. Buckingham Township SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Penn Street, L.P. v. East Lampeter Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. McGonigle v. Lower Heidelberg Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Ethan-Michael, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of Union TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API