Legal Opinion
Stahl v. Upper Southampton Township Zoning Hearing Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 1, 1992No. 320 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRAIG, President Judge.
Paul J. Stahl, Jr., George W. Stahl, Kenneth Greenwood and New Road Associates (Associates) appeal an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County that affirmed a decision of the Zoning Hearing Board of Upper Southampton Township denying the Associates’ petition for a curative amendment. We reverse.
The Associates filed a challenge to the substantive validity of the township’s zoning ordinance and map, under section 1004 of the Municipalities Planning Code (MPC), Act of July 31,1968, P.L. 805, 53 P.S. § 11004. Specifically, the Associates challenged the ordinance…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Concord Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Surrick v. ZHB OF U. PROVIDENCE TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Tidewater Oil Co. v. POORESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Tri-County Landfill, Inc. v. Pine Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Township of Exeter v. Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Montgomery Crossing Associates v. Township of Lower GwyneddCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Crystal Forest Associates, LP v. Buckingham Township SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Interstate Outdoor Advertising, L.P. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Warrington TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.