Legal Opinion
Architectural Heritage Ass'n v. County of Monterey
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 30, 2004No. H026443PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McADAMS, J.
This appeal presents a challenge to the adoption of the mitigated negative declaration under CEQA, the California Environmental Quality Act. Under the standard that governs our review here, we conclude that the challenge has merit. We therefore reverse the judgment.
INTRODUCTION
This dispute involves Monterey County’s Old Jail, located in Salinas, California. The County of Monterey (County) intends to demolish the Old Jail. Acting through its board of supervisors, the County decided to proceed under CEQA by way of a mitigated negative declaration. Plaintiffs Architectural…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- The Pocket Protectors v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Keep Our Mountains Quiet v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Lighthouse Field Beach Rescue v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Save Our Carmel River v. Monterey Peninsula Water Management DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Citizens for Responsible & Open Government v. City of Grand TerraceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.