Legal Opinion

Chizek v. Port of Newport

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1969PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a decree which quieted defendant’s claim of title to a lot located in the tidelands of Yaquina Bay.

The case has some difficult problems involving the law applicable to tidelands and real property generally which we finally have determined need not be answered in deciding this appeal.

The defendant Port claims title through a conveyance from the county.. Subsequently oné Sargeant delivered a conveyance of the lot to the Port in 1954. Sargeant had not paid some of the real property taxes assessed against the property. Through an error the county continued to assess taxes…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. LockeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Hood River County v. DabneyOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State Land Board v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co. v. State Land BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. City of Salem v. Marion CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shasta View Irrigation District v. Amoco Chemicals Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. District of Columbia v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATIONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. City of Medford v. Budge-McHugh Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Brigham v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Faw v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API