Legal Opinion

State Land Board v. Lee

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1917PublishedCited by 39 opinions

From Union: John W. Knowles, Judge. In Banc. Statement by Mr. Justice Harris. This is a suit to foreclose a note and mortgage given to tbe state land board by George H. Osborn and bis wife Mary E. Osborn. Tbe note is dated October 13, 1902) recites that it is for $700 “borrowed on account of the irreducible school fund,” bears interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum, and by its express terms became due “one year after date.”

Read the full summary

From Union: John W. Knowles, Judge. In Banc. Statement by Mr. Justice Harris. This is a suit to foreclose a note and mortgage given to tbe state land board by George H. Osborn and bis wife Mary E. Osborn. Tbe note is dated October 13, 1902) recites that it is for $700 “borrowed on account of the irreducible school fund,” bears interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum, and by its express terms became due “one year after date.” The note was secured by a mortgage on 480 acres of land in sections 10 and 15 of a designated township. No payments were made on the principal of the note. Payments…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harris

It is conceded that the payment of interest tolled the statute of limitations as against the note and that therefore the plaintiff is entitled to a judgment for whatever sums may be due on the note: Section 25, L. O. L. The defendants contend, however, that Chapter 304, Laws 1913, bars the plaintiff from enforcing the lien of the mortgage. The parties did not make any agreement of record extending the time for payment; more than 10 years expired from the date of the *434maturity of the note before the commencement of this suit; and hence the mortgage cannot be foreclosed if Chapter 304, Laws…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Davis v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Bronson v. KinzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  4. Gibson v. ChouteauSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. US Bank v. PLANTERS'BANKSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Coos County v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Shasta View Irrigation District v. Amoco Chemicals Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co. v. State Land BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Evans v. FinleyOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  5. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of Land Office v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API