Legal Opinion

Arnold v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 20, 1928No. E-329PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, Chief Justice,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

This case, in all material aspects, is controlled by the decision of this court in the case of Emmons v. United States, decided February 14, 1927, 63 C. Cls. 121. In Clark's case, 60 C. Cls. 589, 591, it was said: “ When an officer is on duty requiring him to participate regularly and frequently in aerial flights, he is entitled to the pay provided for in the statute during the time he is on such duty from the day he is placed on such duty until he is detached therefrom.” In Bradshaw's case, 62 C. Cls. 638, 644, it was said: “ This…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. LuskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Clark v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
  3. Bradshaw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926
  4. Emmons v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927
  5. Marshall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  2. Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
  3. Lasher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  4. Boone v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  5. Ryle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API