Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 27, 2012No. Misc. Docket AG No. 9PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

I

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (“AGC”), the petitioner, acting pursuant to Md. Rule 16-751,1 filed, through Bar Counsel, a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action against Cotie W. Jones, the respondent. In the Petition, the petitioner alleged that the respondent violated Rules 1.15 Safekeeping Property,2 8.1 Bar Admission and Disciplin*461ary Matters,3 and 8.4 Misconduct4 of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (“MRPC”), as adopted by Md. Rule 16-812; Maryland Rules 16-606 Name and Designation *462of Account,5 16-607 Commingling of Funds,6 16-609 Prohibited…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND OF MARYLAND v. OwrutskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. In Re HarrisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. WooleryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Attorney Grievance v. KarambelasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API