Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 8, 2013No. Misc. Docket AG No. 21PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (“Petitioner” or “Bar Counsel”), acting pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751(a), filed a “Petition For Disciplinary or Remedial Action” against Jimmy Anthony Bell (“Respondent” or “Bell”), on May 23, 2012. Petitioner charged Bell with violating various Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (“MLRPC”1 or “Rule”), specifically Rule 1.1 (Competence),2 Rule 1.15(a) (Safekeeping Property);3 and Rule 8.4(a) and (d) (Misconduct).4 Petitioner also charged Bell with violating several Maryland Rules of Procedure (“Maryland Rule” or “Md. Rule”),…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. Attorney Grievance v. FrankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. Attorney Grievance v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. Attorney Grievance v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  5. Attorney Grievance v. YiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API