Legal Opinion

Dodson v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 2, 1951No. Appeal, No. 263PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Chidsey,

The plaintiff, Elmer Edward Dodson, instituted an action in trespass against Philadelphia Transportation Company to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as the result of a collision between the automobile driven by plaintiff and a street car of the defendant company. The latter has appealed from the refusal of its motions for judgment non obstante veredicto and for a new trial. The jury found a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $20,000, reduced after remittitur filed to $11,500.

The accident occurred on Saturday, September 11, 1948, about 6 p.m. It…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashcraft v. C. G. Hussey and Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. JOHNSON v. ANGRETTISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Streilein v. VogelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Stubbs v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Cox v. Wilkes-Barre Railway Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Estate of SykesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Kurtz v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Szukics v. RuchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Sculley v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Guca v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API