Legal Opinion

Kurtz v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1959No. Appeal, 264PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

The plaintiff in this case, Andrew C. Kurtz, was seriously injured when the 1951 Mercury automobile which he was driving was struck by a street car of the defendant Philadelphia Transportation Company. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff and the defendant has appealed, asking for judgment n.o.v., or, alternatively, a new trial, alleging errors in the judge’s charge.

Since the plaintiff won the verdict we are required to peruse the pages of the record under a lamp which resolves all doubts, contradictions and ambiguities in favor of the plaintiff and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ely v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Ashcraft v. C. G. Hussey and Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. McFadden v. Pennzoil CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Smith v. FlannerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Hinton v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Enfield v. StoutSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Frank v. PeckichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Geelen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Hall v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. McKniff v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API