Legal Opinion

Guca v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 1951No. Appeals, Nos. 52 and 53PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Chidsey,

Forest Avenue in the Borough of Bellevue runs in a northerly and southerly direction. Double street car tracks of the Pittsburgh Railways Company are located in the middle of the avenue which, proceeding in a northerly direction, is paved from curb to curb up to and including its intersection with Maryland Avenue. North of Maryland Avenue there is no paving between the rails of the street car tracks but the paving of the street continues on both sides of the tracks. At about 1 a.m. on July 14,1946, Frank R. Guca was driving his father’s automobile northerly on…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. JaffeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Corbin v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. S. S. Pass Ry. Co. v. TrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  4. Irwin Savings & Trust Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Zurcher v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Robert v. ChodoffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Hammonds v. HavenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. Steele v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Davis v. FeinsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Altamuro v. Milner Hotel, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API