Legal Opinion
Triplett v. MYSTAF MEDICAL
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 12, 2010No. 107,277. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CAROL M. HANSEN, Judge.
¶ 1 This special proceeding to review an order of the Workers’ Compensation trial court denying compensability to Claimant, Annette Triplett, turns on a single issue. We vacate the order and hold Claimant’s *926injuries arose out of and in the course of her employment with Mystaf Medical.
¶ 2 Claimant worked in collections for Capital One Auto Finance. Mystaf Medical, a job placement service, had placed Claimant at Capital One where she had worked since October of 2008. On January 27, 2009, Claimant came to work early because the roads were icy and slick from a snow storm.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thomas v. Keith Hensel Optical LabsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- American Management Systems, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Owings v. Pool Well ServiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Corbett v. Express PersonnelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Fudge v. University of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Triplett v. MYSTAF MEDICALCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010