Legal Opinion

In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 08-174 Hartsfield

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 9, 2012No. 453A11PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER OF SUSPENSION

As a result of conduct inappropriate to her judicial office, on 23 September 2011, the Judicial Standards Commission (Commission) entered a recommendation that this Court suspend respondent, Denise S. Hartsfield, a Judge of the General Court of Justice, District Court Division, Judicial District Twenty-One, without compensation from the performance of her judicial duties for a suitable period of time. For the reasons that follow, this Court concludes respondent should be suspended without compensation from the performance of her judicial duties for seventy-five days.

On 11…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. In Re BadgettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  4. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 238 BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  5. In Re Inquiry Concerning BadgettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 14-126B MacKSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  2. In Re Inquiry Concerning 17-143 Apr. M. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
  3. In Re ShipleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  4. In Re Inquiry Concerning a JudgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
  5. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 15-222Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API