Legal Opinion

In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 2015No. 186A15PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

By the recommendation of the North Carolina Judicial Standards Commission (Commission), the issue before this Court is whether James T. Hill (Respondent), a Judge of the General Court of Justice, District Court Division, Judicial District 14, should be publicly reprimanded for conduct in violation of Canons 1,2A, 3A(1), 3A(3), and 3A(4) of the North Carolina Code of Judicial Conduct and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute in violation of N.C.G.S. § 7A-376. Respondent does not contest the facts or oppose the Commission’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re BadgettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 08-174 HartsfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re EakinCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API