Legal Opinion

In Re Inquiry Concerning 17-143 Apr. M. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 10, 2019No. 419A18PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue before the Court is whether District Court Judge April M. Smith, Respondent, should be publicly reprimanded for violations of Canons 1, 2A, 3A(3), and 3B(1) of the North Carolina Code of Judicial Conduct amounting to conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute in violation of N.C.G.S. § 7A-376(b). Respondent has not challenged the findings of fact made by the Judicial Standards Commission (the Commission) or opposed the Commission's recommendation that she be publicly reprimanded by this Court.

On 20 February 2018, Commission…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge NowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. In Re BadgettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  3. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 08-174 HartsfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  4. In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, Nos. 09-013, 09-018 & 09-029 BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  5. In Re Inquiry Concerning BadgettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. EARLS v. NORTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION, THEDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2023
  2. EARLS v. NORTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION, THEDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2023
  3. In re ClontzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API