Legal Opinion

(PS) Schmitz v. Asman

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 14, 2025No. 2:20-cv-00195Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS SCHMITZ, et al., No. 2:20-cv-0195 DJC CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 ADAM ASMAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs Thomas Schmitz1 and Dianne Mallia proceed without counsel with civil rights 18 claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is before the court for a further order on the 19 motion for protective order filed by defendants Adams, Andaluz, Ashe, Asman, Branman, 20 Brizendine, Brockenborough, Ceballos, Diaz, Heatley, J. Johnson, R. Johnson, Kernan, Ponciano, 21…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Barton v. ClancyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. RicheyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. GrafCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Curtis R. Martin, Jr., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API