Legal Opinion

State v. Alexander

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 2012No. 20090829PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice DURRANT,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

T1 In this case, we consider the showing required for a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea under the current version of section 77-13-6 of the Utah Code (Plea Withdrawal Statute or Statute)2 and rule 11 of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure.

T2 In 2007, James Alexander pled guilty to burglary with intent to commit sexual battery. Prior to his sentencing, Mr. Alexander filed a timely motion to withdraw his guilty plea. In that motion, he argued that when the district court accepted his guilty plea, it failed to apprise him of the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. MoaUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. CollinsUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. Damien A. CandlandUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. TrotterUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Arriaga v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2020

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API