Legal Opinion

Gregg v. State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 2012No. Nos. 20090255, 20090567PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice PARRISH,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

T1 Petitioner David Vincent Gregg appeals the dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief, The district court dismissed Mr. Gregg's claims as procedurally barred under the Post-Conviction Remedies Act (PCRA). We hold that Mr. Gregg qualifies for an exception to the procedural bar because he received ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. Therefore, we vacate his conviction and remand for new trial.

BACKGROUND

12 On July 18, 2003, David Vincent Gregg was convicted of rape, a first-degree felony. The trial court sentenced…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. TemplinUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. BluffUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Gardner v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Lafferty v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. GriffinUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  3. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
  4. Noor v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. DrommondUtah Supreme Court · 2020

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API