Legal Opinion

State v. Oster

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1962No. 13372PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeeey, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of burglary not in a dwelling, and appeals. He assigns as errors the refusal of the trial court to grant his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal; the admissions of evidence of another crime; the admission of certain fruits of the crime, which were not shown by direct testimony to have been in defendant’s possession; and, that the instruction requiring corroboration of the testimony of an accomplice was erroneous.

The error assigned in the refusal to grant a directed verdict of acquittal is based upon the argument that there was not sufficient…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DennisOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  2. State v. BrakeOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State v. JensenOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State v. ReynoldsOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. McLeanOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. State v. OsterOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State v. RileyOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API