Legal Opinion

State v. Oster

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1962No. 13376PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

The defendant was convicted by a jury of the crime of receiving and concealing stolen property in Marion County, Oregon. The amended indictment described the property as “* * * 650 check blanks and one Todd Protectograph check protector, and one Royal standard typewriter, of the personal property of Pepsi Cola Bottling Company, a corporation, * * * .” The court, in its charge to the jury, limited the issue to 650 check blanks.

The defendant has appealed and assigns error to the court’s denial of his motion for a directed verdict of not guilty based on the ground of alleged insufficiency of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BrakeOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State v. ReynoldsOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State v. HandlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. State v. WillsonOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. KietzkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. State v. FarrCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. Lambiotte v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  5. State v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API