State v. Oster
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
The defendant was convicted by a jury of the crime of receiving and concealing stolen property in Marion County, Oregon. The amended indictment described the property as “* * * 650 check blanks and one Todd Protectograph check protector, and one Royal standard typewriter, of the personal property of Pepsi Cola Bottling Company, a corporation, * * * .” The court, in its charge to the jury, limited the issue to 650 check blanks.
The defendant has appealed and assigns error to the court’s denial of his motion for a directed verdict of not guilty based on the ground of alleged insufficiency of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BrakeOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. ReynoldsOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. HandlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- State v. WillsonOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. KietzkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- State v. FarrCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- Lambiotte v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- State v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.