Legal Opinion

Manzano v. Kansas Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 9, 2014No. 108,861PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leben, J.:

The Kansas implied-consent law provides that a driver’s license may be suspended for a failure to take a blood or *264breath test for alcohol when a law-enforcement officer has reasonable grounds to believe the person was driving while intoxicated. But the law also provides hearings that meet constitutional due-process requirements by allowing both an administrative heating before a Kansas Department of Revenue hearing officer and, if unsuccessful there, a new trial before the district court.

The Department of Revenue appeals the district court’s order setting aside the administrative…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Snider v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. Bruch v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. Sunflower Racing, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  5. Kempke v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Board of Riley County Comm'rs v. Kansas Historical SocietyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2025
  2. In re Equalization of Ruffin WoodlandsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API