Legal Opinion

STATE Ex Rel OREGON STATE BAR v. LENSKE

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1965PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*479HOLMAN, J.

Defendant is a member of the Oregon State Bar and was convicted in the District Conrt of the United States for the District of Oregon of “* * * wilfully and knowingly attempting to evade and defeat a large part of income tax due and owing by defendant * * The records of this conrt show that the Oregon State Bar filed with it a certified copy of the judgment of conviction; that, pursuant to Rule I of the rules of this court for admission of attorneys, this court summarily suspended defendant from the practice of law in Oregon; and that the Oregon State Bar was notified by letter of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex parte Ah MenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. State v. KaiserOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  3. State v. DowningOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Trullinger v. HoweOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. State v. SieberOregon Supreme Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re Darwin Charles BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  3. Sadler v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Circuit Court v. AFSCME Local 502-AOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Arnett v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API