Beld v. Darst
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Newaygo; Palmer, J. Case by John H. Beld against Warren Darst for breach ■of a contract for the raising of a certain crop. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
On the 2d of September, 1902, the plaintiff .and the defendant entered into an agreement whereby the plaintiff agreed to put in, care for, harvest, and sell, if directed so to do, a crop of onions on the lands of defendant. The basis of the agreement between the parties was *144a written contract between the defendant and other parties for the raising of onions and potatoes on lands of defendant in Indiana, upon which the contract stated there were certain buildings, which were not present on the Michigan lands, and there were provisions of the written contract which were inapplicable to the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stahelin v. SowleMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by7 opinions
- Beaman v. TestoriMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Michigan Bank, National Ass'n v. William J. Kahlich, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Schultz v. SilverMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Bennett v. DentonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Electrical Appliance Co. v. Standard Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.