Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Denton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1917No. Docket No. 32PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Chippewa; Fead, J. Assumpsit by James T. Bennett against William L. Denton for broker’s commissions. Judgment for plaintiff on a directed verdict. Defendant brings, error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

The defendant listed his farm for sale in plaintiffs real estate agency at Sault Ste. Marie in the summer of 1918. Subsequently plaintiff found him -a buyer who purchased the farm. It was the claim of plaintiff that he was entitled to an agreed commission thereon of $600. The case was called in the circuit court, and the trial, proceeded upon the expectation by defendant’s counsel that defendant, who was absent from the city, would return in season to testify in his own behalf. He failed to return before the testimony was concluded, and the trial court directed a verdict for the plaintiff for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Selby v. Detroit RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Tobin v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Lincoln v. FeltMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Beld v. DarstMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Wilbur v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zeilman v. FryMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Downing v. UnderwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Cheff v. TerpstraMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API