Electrical Appliance Co. v. Standard Electric Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Murphy, J. Assumpsit by the Electrical Appliance Company against the Standard Electric Company for goods sold and delivered. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The defendant is an installing company at Detroit, and the plaintiff is a manufacturer of electrical apparatus and appliances, whose office is at Cincinnati. In the early part of 1904, the defendant was negotiating a contract with the Detroit Stove Works to supply and install in the plant of that company a telephone system. At this time it evidently had before it the. catalogues issued by the plaintiff company. At any rate, the testimony shows that it had such catalogues be*663fore the giving of the order in question in this case. On the 3d of February defendant wrote plaintiff asking it to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McCray Refrigerator & Cold Storage Co. v. Woods & ZentMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Nichols, Shepard & Co. v. CrandallMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- John Hutchison Manufacturing Co. v. PinchMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Zimmerman Manufacturing Co. v. DolphMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Beld v. DarstMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brown v. Farmer & Ochs Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- Union Trust Co. v. Detroit River Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910