Legal Opinion
State v. Loscomb
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 13, 1981No. [No. 38, September Term, 1980.]PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavidson, J.
Smith and Cole, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part. Smith, J., filed a concurring and dissenting opinion at page 437 infra, in which Cole, J., concurs.
This case concerns the circumstances under which the results of chemical tests for alcohol are admissible in evidence. More particularly, it presents three questions. The first question is whether the exclusionary rule contained in Md. Code (1974, 1980 Repl. Vol.) § 10-309 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, which, under certain circumstances, renders tfie results of chemical tests inadmissible, is applicable in a prosecution…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. GartelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Dillon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Rail RoadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1832
- Applestein v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- People v. LoweSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- District of Columbia v. ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Gargliano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Sites v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.