Legal Opinion
Churchill Village, L.L.C. v. General Electric Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 10, 2000No. 3:99-cv-05073PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATEL, Chief Judge.
In November 1999, plaintiffs Churchill Village, Barbara Dorsett, and A1 Dorsett, individually and on behalf of the public (“plaintiffs”), brought this action against General Electric Company (“defendant”), premised on this court’s diversity jurisdiction. Plaintiffs allege two causes of action: (1) violation of unlawful, fraudulent, and unfair business acts and practices under California Business and Professions Code sections 17200 et seq. (“UCL”); and (2) violation of false advertising acts under California Business and Professions Code Sections 17500 et seq.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Lavie v. Procter & Gamble Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Colgan v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Bardin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- BROCKET v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Zarrella v. Pacific Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.