Legal Opinion

Hobart Iron Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided January 23, 1934No. Docket No. 33413Published

A corporation which derives income from mining operations conducted under a sublease on land which was directly leased by the State of Minnesota to two individuals, the land being a portion of the property held in trust by the State of Minnesota for its state university, is liable to income tax upon the income derived from such mining operations.

1Opinion of the Court

HOBART IRON COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Hobart Iron Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 33413.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

29 B.T.A. 855; 1934 BTA LEXIS 1468;

January 23, 1934, Promulgated

A corporation which derives income from mining operations conducted under a sublease on land which was directly leased by the State of Minnesota to two individuals, the land being a portion of the property held in trust by the State of Minnesota for its state university, is liable to income tax upon the income derived from such mining operations.

Ellsworth C. Alvord,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Gillespie v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Fox Film Corp. v. DoyalSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Burnet v. A. T. Jergins TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API