Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 2005No. 26580PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JEFFREY W. BATES, Chief Judge.

The Director of Revenue (“Director”) revoked the driving privileges of Mark K. Richardson (“Richardson”) for allegedly refusing to submit to a chemical test of his blood alcohol content pursuant to § 577.041. 1 Thereafter, Richardson filed a petition in circuit court requesting a trial de novo, and the only evidence submitted in the case was the Director’s records. Because these records were internally inconsistent with respect to whether Richardson refused the breathalyzer test, the trial court set aside the revocation and ordered the Director to reinstate…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Hinnah v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. Verdoorn v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  4. Jarrell v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Reece v. Director of Revenue, State of Mo.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Howdeshell v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Findley v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Kimbrell v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Rogers v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Brinker v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API