Legal Opinion

Jarrell v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 2001No. 23803PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHRUM, Judge.

Citing part of Missouri’s Implied Consent Law, specifically § 577.041.3, RSMo Cum.Supp.1999, Missouri’s Director of Revenue (“Director”) revoked the license of Mike D. Jarrell (“Jarrell”) to operate a motor vehicle.1 Director based the revocation on Jarrell’s refusal to submit to a chemical test of his breath pursuant to § 577.020.1.

Jarrell petitioned the circuit court for review of Director’s decision, per § 577.041.4. After an evidentiary hearing, the court entered a judgment that set aside the revocation and ordered Jarrell’s license reinstated. Director appeals. We affirm.

Thre…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Berry v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. Tebow v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Aviation Supply Corp. v. R.S.B.I. Aerospace, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Calicotte v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Reece v. Director of Revenue, State of Mo.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Zimmerman v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Lambert v. HolbertMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Dixon v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Richardson v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API