Legal Opinion

Findley v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 7, 2006No. 27136PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JEFFREY W. BATES, Chief Judge.

William Findley (Petitioner) appeals from a judgment sustaining the decision of the Director of Revenue (Director) to revoke Petitioner’s driving privilege for one year pursuant to § 577.041 for refusing to submit to a chemical test to determine his blood alcohol content. 1 We affirm.

A person who operates a motor vehicle upon a public highway of this state is deemed to have consented to undergo a blood test to determine his or her blood alcohol content after being arrested “for any offense arising out of acts which the arresting officer had reasonable grounds to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hinnah v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  2. Verdoorn v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  3. Brown v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  4. Hawk v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MO.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Berry v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. BurksMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Bruce v. State, Department of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Sonia Kuessner v. Justin WootenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  4. Gannon v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Edwards v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATEMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API