Legal Opinion
Murkeldove v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 15, 2011No. 09-10902, 09-11093PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant, McClenon Murkeldove, Jr., sought past-due benefits from the Social Security Commissioner, and his claim was denied. He subsequently ap pealed the decision to the district court. After the district court reversed the Social Security Commissioner’s decision and remanded the case for further proceedings, Murkeldove applied for attorney’s fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A), a subsection of the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). The district court denied his request. Murkeldove appealed the district court’s judgment.
In unrelated cases,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Kerr Ex Rel. Kerr v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Turner v. Commissioner of Social SEC.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Centennial Archaeology, Inc. v. AECOM, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States ex rel. Carter v. Halliburton Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.