Legal Opinion
State Board of Pharmacy v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 15, 1978No. Civ. 42642PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, J.
We granted an alternative writ of mandate to review the legality of an order of the superior court denying petitioner’s motion to quash a “subpoena re deposition” served upon the state’s Attorney General.
The facts are uncontroverted.
In an action successfully maintained by them against California State Board of Pharmacy the superior court ordered that real parties in interest were entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees, the amount of which would be determined later. Thereafter real parties in interest served upon the Attorney General a subpoena commanding him to appear at…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- James Weir v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Union Savings Bank of Patchogue, New York v. SaxonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1962
- Wirtz v. Local 30, International Union of Operating EngineersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Capitol Vending Co. v. BakerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964
3Cited by17 opinions
- Citizens for Open Access to Sand and Tide, Inc. v. Seadrift Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Detoy v. City & County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000
- In re StierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People ex rel. Department of Conservation v. El Dorado CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- California Air Resources Board v. HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.