Legal Opinion
Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 21, 1991No. 90-1662PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:
Five abortion clinics and one physician (the “clinics”) raise a facial constitutional challenge to certain 1988 and 1989 amendments to the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982 (the “Act”). See 18 Pa. Cons.Stat.Ann. §§ 3201-3220 (1983 & Supp. 1991). The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania held that §§ 3205 (informed consent), 3206 (parental consent), 3209 (spousal notice), 3214(a) (reporting requirements), and 3207(b) and 3214(f) (public disclosure of clinics’ reports) violate the Due Process Clause of the…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. Tashiri Wayne WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Alice Sammon v. New Jersey Board Of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Planned Parenthood Of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Loftus v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.