Legal Opinion

Planned Parenthood Of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 21, 1991No. 90-1662PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

947 F.2d 682

60 USLW 2276

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA,

Reproductive Health and Counseling Center Women's Health

Services, Inc., Women's Suburban Clinic, Allentown Women's

Center, Northeast Women's Center, Allen, Thomas, M.D., on

behalf of himself and all others similarly situated

v.

CASEY, Robert P., Richards, N. Mark, Preate, Ernest,

personally and in their official capacities, and Marino,

Michael D., personally and in his official capacity,

together with all others similarly situated.

Robert P. Casey, N. Mark Richards and Ernest D. Preate, Jr.,

Appellants.

No. 90-1662.

United States…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited101 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Ramos v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  2. Harold Katz and Ruth Katz v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Nos. 96-5132, 96-5416Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. Rappa v. New Castle CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. Ramos v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API