Legal Opinion

In re Kohl's Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided October 4, 2016No. MDL No. 2736PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

Sarah S. Vance, Chair

Before the Panel:* Plaintiff in an action pending in the Northern District of Illinois *1364(Ankcorn) moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize twenty actions in that district. The actions, which are listed on the attached Schedule A, are pending in a total of twelve districts. The Panel has been informed of four additional related federal actions.

Responding plaintiffs’ positions on centralization vary. Plaintiffs in the District of Nevada Spencer and Central District of California Pepka actions support centralization in the Northern District of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Arrivalstar S.A. Fleet Management Systems Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
  2. In re Lifewatch, Inc., Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015
  3. In re Credit Protection Ass'nUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2016
  4. In re Live Face On Web, LLCUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Quevedo v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
  2. Roy v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API