Legal Opinion
In re Arrivalstar S.A. Fleet Management Systems Patent Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided August 9, 2011No. MDL No. 2253PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING TRANSFER
JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.
Before the Panel:* Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, defendant in a Southern District of Florida infringement action, CES Wireless Technologies Corp., seeks centralization in the Southern District of Florida. This litigation currently consists of nineteen actions1 listed on Schedule A and pending in seven districts.2
*1379Patentholders ArrivalStar S.A. and Mel-vino Technologies Ltd. (ArrivalStar) oppose centralization and, alternatively, suggest centralization in the Northern District of Illinois. Two governmental entities— The Port Authority of New…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re Eli Lilly & Co.(cephalexin Monohydrate)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
3Cited by17 opinions
- In re Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC, Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
- In re Bobo Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
- In re Genetic Technologies Ltd. (´179) Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
- In re Kohl's Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2016
- In re Blue Spike, LLCUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.