Legal Opinion
Roy v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 15, 2021No. 2:13-cv-02008Unknown
1Opinion
| hereby attest and certify on Dec □□□ 2020 that the for ocument is a full, true and correct copy of the original UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANELinmy tice andinmylegalaustody. □□□ on □ KBE MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION eee eee □□□□□ □□□ outhern District of California □□ By: 5/J. Taylor Ss “Deputy —SSS—S IN RE: MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT (TCPA) LITIGATION MDL No. 2286 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) vee CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER The transferee court in this litigation has advised the Panel that coordinated or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & LerachSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- In Re Silica Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
- In Re Holiday Magic Securities & Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
- In Re Heritage Bonds LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2002
- In Re Midland Credit Management, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.