Legal Opinion

In re Credit Protection Ass'n

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided June 2, 2016No. MDL No. 2716PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

Sarah S. Vance, Chair

Before the Panel:* Common defendant Credit Protection Association, L.P. (CPA) moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize eight actions in the Northern District of Texas. The eight actions are pending in the Northern District of Texas (two actions), the District of Arizona, the Middle District of Florida (three actions), the Southern District of Florida, and the Southern District of Texas, as listed on the attached Schedule A.1 Responding plaintiffs oppose centralization.

On the basis of the papers filed and the hearing session held, we deny CPA’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Lifewatch, Inc., Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Kohl's Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2016
  2. In re United Collection Bureau, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API