Legal Opinion
Banco Nacional Ultramarino v. First Nat. Bank
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 16, 1923No. 1428PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETERS, District Judge.
This is a suit on a bill of exchange drawn by Magalhaes & Co., of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on the First National *171Bank of Boston, in favor of the plaintiff, for $43,674.54, dated July 28, 1920, at 15 days’ sight, protested for nonacceptance on August 30th, and for nonpayment on September 30th.
There are two counts in the writ. Tlie first declares on the draft as an accepted draft by virtue of a promise to accept; the second, on the promise itself. The facts from which the plaintiff claims to recover for a breach of contract on the part of the defendant are substantially as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bates v. CashmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Lamborn v. Lake Shore Banking & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- International Banking Corp. v. Irving Nat. BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921
- Bank of Buchanan County v. Continental Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Germania National Bank of New Orleans v. TaaksNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
3Cited by13 opinions
- Banco Espanol De Credito v. State Street Bank and Trust Company, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
- Continental Nat. Bank v. National City Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Second Nat. Bank of Allegheny v. Lash Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
- Crocker First Nat. Bank of San Francisco v. De SousaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Bank of Taiwan, Ltd. v. Union Nat. Bank of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.