Legal Opinion

Crocker First Nat. Bank of San Francisco v. De Sousa

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 25, 1928No. 5456PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

Early in May, 1920, De Sousa So Co., a copartnership, as vendors, entered into a contract with Hind, Rolph So Co., a copartnership, as purchasers, for the sale of 500 tons of sugar. On May 20,1920, in compliance with the contract of sale, the purchasers procured from the Crocker National Bank of San Francisco a letter of credit in the sum of $208,000 in favor of the vendors, in which the bank agreed that it would accept upon presentation, and pay in 60 days, drafts not to exceed $208,000 against a shipment of 500 tons, net, white J ava refined granulated sugar, 97/98°…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Moss v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Norrington v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Harrison v. FortlageSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Filley v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Old Colony Trust Co. v. Lawyers' Title & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Courtaulds North America, Inc. v. North Carolina National Bank, a National Banking AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  2. Banco Espanol De Credito v. State Street Bank and Trust Company, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
  3. Continental Nat. Bank v. National City Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  4. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  5. Fidelity Nat. Bank of South Miami v. DADE CTY.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API