Legal Opinion
Bank of Taiwan, Ltd. v. Union Nat. Bank of Philadelphia
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 26, 1924No. 3142PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
The GorgasPierie Company of Philadelphia, hereafter called the Gorgas Company, entered into a contract on August 7, 1920, with the Nanyo Boyeki Kaisha, Limited, of Tokio, Japan, hereafter called the Nanyo Company, for the purchase of 300 tons of copra at 7% cents per pound, to be shipped “from the Orient by steamer during September or October, 1920.” The contract provided that the Gorgas Company should furnish a confirmed irrevocable banker’s letter of credit for the full amount of the contract in favor of Nanyo Company, payable 95 per cent, of the value of the shipping…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Littlejohn v. . ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Caulkins v. . HellmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Mora Y Ledon v. . HavemeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Frey & Son, Inc. v. E. R. Sherburne Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Barclays Bank D. C. O. v. Mercantile National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Siderius, Inc. v. Wallace Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- First Arlington National Bank v. StathisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Shears v. All States Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Paul Klopstock & Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.