Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Beautone Specialties, Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Based on a review of the file, record, and proceedings herein, the court grants defendants’ motion in part and denies it in part.
DISCUSSION
This case arises out of a trademark dispute between rival sticky note manufacturers, plaintiff Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Inc. (“3M”) and defendants Beautone Specialties Co., Ltd (“Beautone”) and Taiwan Hopax Chemicals Mfg. Co. Ltd. (“Hopax”). Beautone is a subsidiary of Hopax. In the late 1970s, 3M created a brand of sticky notes under the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Globalaw Ltd. v. Carmon & Carmon Law OfficeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- American Ass'n for Justice v. American Trial Lawyers Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Helpful Hound, L. L.C. v. New Orleans Bldg. Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2018
- Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, Inc. v. Rushmore Photo & Gifts, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2017
- NYU Langone Health System v. Northwell Health, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.