Legal Opinion
Lovy v. State Farm Insurance Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 10, 1981No. Docket Nos. 41981, 43504PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, P. J.
These consolidated appeals raise the question of the type and extent of coverages afforded under eight different insurance policies 1 to Kondrack, the permissive driver of a vehicle rented from Hopkins by the plaintiff, George P. Lovy. 2 For the reasons set forth below, we have concluded that the declaratory judgment in No. 43504 must be reversed, and the summary judgment in No. 41981 affirmed.
The basic underlying facts are not in dispute. So far as here pertinent, on May 25, 1973, Lovy rented a 1973 Honda from Hopkins for a pleasure trip to Yosemite National Park. At the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Argonaut Insurance v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1972
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Equity Mutual Insurance Co. v. Spring Valley Wholesale Nursery, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Sequoia InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Nabisco, Inc. v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Alderson v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Hertz Corp. v. Home InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.