Legal Opinion
Hertz Corp. v. Home Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 31, 1993No. D013976PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FROEHLICH, J.
The Home Insurance Company and H. L. Yoh Company (appellants) appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the Hertz Corporation and Fireman’s Fund Insurance Companies (respondents) in a declaratory relief action. The parties had disputed the question of who was obligated to fund the settlement entered into with two third party victims injured in an accident involving a person covered by various policies of insurance. The trial court ruled in favor of respondents, because the insuring agreements issued by respondents contained an exclusion purporting to bar coverage for the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Neighbours v. Buzz Oates EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Miller v. Elite InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Hackethal v. National Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Cal-Farm Insurance v. TAC Exterminators, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wayne v. Staples, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. BarerraArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- Clarendon National Insurance v. Insurance Co. of the WestDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
- Collins v. RandallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Grand Rent a Car Corp. v. 20th Century InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.