Legal Opinion

United States v. Peter Monsanto

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 1, 1988No. 436, Docket 87-1397PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Robert J. Ward, J., denying a motion to vacate or modify an ex parte post-indictment restraining order entered pursuant to a provision of the Comprehensive Forfeiture Act of 1984 (CFA), 21 U.S.C. § 853(e)(1)(A) and for a declaration that fees paid to appellant’s defense counsel would be exempt from post-conviction forfeiture pursuant to the “relation back” provision of the CFA, 21 U.S.C. § 853(c). The appeal was originally heard by a panel of the court, 836 F.2d 74 (2d Cir.1987), and has…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Peter MonsantoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Amy Travel Service, Inc., Resort Performance, Inc., Resort Telemarketing, Inc., Thomas P. McCann Ii, and James F. WeilandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API